Archive for the ‘Military and defense’ Category
Tuesday, February 9th, 2010
Terrorist Attacks on Commercial Airlines: Federal Criminal Prohibitions (PDF; 181 KB)
Source: Congressional Research Service (via Federation of American Scientists/Secrecy News)
Federal authorities can and have prosecuted terrorist attacks on commercial airlines under a wide variety of federal statutes. Some of those statutes outlaw crimes committed aboard a commercial airliner; some, crimes committed against the aircraft itself; others, crimes involving the use of firearms or explosives; still others, crimes committed for terrorist purposes. Within each category, the law reaches co-conspirators and other accomplices. Moreover, although most apply when committed within the United States, many apply to terrorist attacks overseas, particularly but necessarily, when the victims are Americans or U.S. airlines.
Posted in Air travel, Congressional Research Service, Government and politics, Legal and law enforcement, Security, Terrorism | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 9th, 2010
Al Qaeda and Affiliates: Historical Perspective, Global Presence, and Implications for U.S. Policy (PDF; 324 KB)
Source: Congressional Research Service (via Federation of American Scientists/Secrecy News)
Al Qaeda (AQ) has evolved into a significantly different terrorist organization than the one that perpetrated the September 11, 2001, attacks. At the time, Al Qaeda was composed mostly of a core cadre of veterans of the Afghan insurgency against the Soviets, with a centralized leadership structure, made up mostly of Egyptians. Most of the organization’s plots either emanated from the top or were approved by the leadership. Some analysts describe pre-9/11 Al Qaeda as akin to a corporation, with Osama Bin Laden acting as an agile Chief Executive Officer issuing orders and soliciting ideas from subordinates.
Some would argue that the Al Qaeda of that period no longer exists. Out of necessity, due to pressures from the security community, in the ensuing years it has transformed into a diffuse global network and philosophical movement composed of dispersed nodes with varying degrees of independence. The core leadership, headed by Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, is thought to live in the mountainous tribal belt of northwest Pakistan, where it continues to train operatives, recruit, and disseminate propaganda. But Al Qaeda franchises or affiliated groups active in countries such as Yemen and Somalia now represent critical power centers in the larger movement. Some affiliates receive money, training, and weapons; others look to the core leadership in Pakistan for strategic guidance, theological justification, and a larger narrative of global struggle. Over the past year senior government officials have assessed the trajectory of Al Qaeda to be “less centralized command and control, (with) no clear center of gravity, and likely rising and falling centers of gravity, depending on where the U.S. and the international focus is for that period.” While a degraded corporate Al Qaeda may be welcome news to many, a trend has emerged over the past few years that some view as more difficult to detect, if not potentially more lethal.
The Al Qaeda network today also comprises semi-autonomous or self radicalized actors, who often have only peripheral or ephemeral ties to either the core cadre in Pakistan or affiliated groups elsewhere. According to U.S. officials Al Qaeda cells and associates are located in over 70 countries. Sometimes these individuals never leave their home country but are radicalized with the assistance of others who have traveled abroad for training and indoctrination through the use of modern technologies. In many ways, the dispersion of Al Qaeda affiliates fits into the larger strategy of Bin Laden and his associates. They have sought to serve as the vanguard of a religious movement that inspires Muslims and other individuals aspiring to join a jihadi movement to help establish a global caliphate through violent means. The name “Qaeda” means “base” or “foundation,” upon which its members hope to build a robust, geographically-diverse network.
Understanding the origins of Al Qaeda, its goals, current activities, and prospective future pursuits is key to developing sound U.S. strategies, policies, and programs. Appreciating the adaptive nature of Al Qaeda as a movement and the ongoing threat it projects onto U.S. global security interests assists in many facets of the national security enterprise; including, securing the homeland, congressional legislative process and oversight, alignment of executive branch resources and coordination efforts, and prioritization of foreign assistance.
The focus of this report is on the history of Al Qaeda, actions and capabilities of the organization and non-aligned entities, and an analysis of select regional Al Qaeda affiliates. This report may be updated as events warrant.
Posted in Congressional Research Service, Government and politics, National security, Terrorism | No Comments »
Monday, February 8th, 2010
Army Deployments to OIF and OEF
Source: RAND Corporation
In light of some publicly voiced misconceptions regarding the Army’s capacity to deploy additional soldiers to Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), RAND Arroyo Center was asked to assess the demands placed upon the Army by these deployments. Analyzing Department of Defense deployment data, Arroyo found that the Army has provided over 1 million troop-years to OIF and OEF, and that most active-duty soldiers now deployed to these operations are on their second or third tour. Those active-duty soldiers who have not yet gone to Iraq or Afghanistan typically fall into one of two categories: new soldiers, needing to complete training before deployment; and experienced soldiers, needed for other missions. The demand for active duty soldiers in OEF and OIF would have exceeded supply under the Army’s normal deployment policies, so the Army and the Department of Defense took several actions to increase supply: it increased the overall size of the active component; it reassigned soldiers from other assignments and missions to the pool of soldiers rotating to OEF and OIF; and it greatly increased the rate at which soldiers rotate to and from the wars. Despite these adaptations, the Army retains very limited unutilized capacity to deploy additional active-duty soldiers beyond the current troop levels in OEF and OIF.
Posted in Afghanistan, Middle East, Military and defense | No Comments »
Monday, February 8th, 2010
Security in Iraq: A Framework for Analyzing Emerging Threats as U.S. Forces Leave
Source: RAND Corporation
U.S. withdrawal from Iraq could affect Iraq’s internal security and stability, which could in turn affect U.S. strategic interests and the safety of U.S. troops and civilians in Iraq. U.S. policy-makers need a dynamic analytic framework with which to examine the shifting motivations and capabilities of the actors that affect Iraq’s security. The framework recognizes dangers from extremists, mainstream political actors, and the politicization of the security forces. It asserts that security in Iraq depends on the major political actors using the political process instead of violence to achieve their goals, and professional, apolitical security forces. Extremist violence, while inevitable, cannot by itself threaten the state. To help achieve U.S. goals in Iraq, long-term U.S.-Iraq military cooperation should have three missions: building security force capability, enhancing its professional character, and building confidence between Iraqi state and Kurdish regional forces. Fulfilling these three missions will require well-prepared and well-placed, relatively senior professionals at every level; development of long-term relationships with Iraqi counterparts; and, possibly, a newly agreed mandate. With such efforts, the United States should be able to contribute to continued strengthening of the internal security and stability of Iraq even as it withdraws its forces.
Posted in Government and politics, Middle East, Military and defense | No Comments »
Friday, February 5th, 2010
Ballistic Missile Defense Review
Source: U.S. Department of Defense
The Ballistic Missile Defense Review (BMDR) is a review conducted pursuant to guidance from the President and the Secretary of Defense, while also addressing the legislative requirement to assess U.S. ballistic missile defense policy and strategy. The BMDR will evaluate the threats posed by ballistic missiles and develop a missile defense posture to address current and future challenges.
+ Full Report (PDF; 2 MB)
Posted in Government and politics, Military and defense, National security | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010
New GAO Report (PDFs)
Source: Government Accountability Office
1. Littoral Combat Ship: Actions Needed to Improve Operating Cost Estimates and Mitigate Risks in Implementing New Concepts
Highlights ||| Full Report
Posted in GAO, Government and politics, Military and defense | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010
U.S. Less Free than Lithuania, Hungary and Malta in InternationalLiving.com’s 2010 Quality of Life Index
Source: InternationalLiving.com
According to the 2010 Quality of Living Index published by InternationalLiving.com the U.S. is less free than Lithuania, Hungary, Malta and 42 other countries.
Out of a possible 100 points, the U.S. gets a score of 92, behind countries like Slovenia, Puerto Rico, Micronesia, and Estonia.
How is it possible that the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave ranks lower than Chile and Panama in the category of Freedom?
“You can blame much of it on the Patriot Act,” says Dan Prescher, Special Projects Editor at International Living. “Freedom is a hard thing to measure, so perception figures heavily into the Freedom ranking of the Index. And since the passage of the Patriot Act, many Americans have the feeling that their basic rights and freedoms, especially the right to privacy and the freedom from unwarranted searches and seizures, have been drastically reduced.”
Prescher says that, although the specific provisions of the Patriot Act are unclear to most Americans, there is a sense that the Act gives the government wide powers to limit personal freedoms in the name of fighting terror.
+ 2010 Quality of Life Index: 194 Countries Ranked and Rated to Reveal the Best Places to Live
Posted in International, Lists & Rankings, National security, Social and cultural issues, Terrorism | No Comments »
Monday, February 1st, 2010
2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (PDF; 6 MB)
Source: U.S. Department of Defense
From press release:
The QDR examines DoD strategies and priorities. It assesses the threats and challenges that the nation faces and re-balances DoD’s strategies, capabilities, and forces to ensure the U.S. military has the flexibility to address today’s conflicts and tomorrow’s threats. The BMDR evaluates the ballistic missile threat to the U.S. and its allies and articulates policy. It determines the appropriate role of ballistic missile defense in the country’s national security and military strategies.
Posted in Military and defense | No Comments »
Monday, February 1st, 2010
OPM Releases Strategic Plan on Veterans Employment
Source: Office of Personnel Management
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released a government wide Strategic Plan to increase support and access for Veterans seeking employment with the Federal government. The plan is part of President Obama’s Veterans Employment Initiative, a pragmatic, straightforward approach to helping the men and women who have served our country in the military find employment as civilians in the Federal Government.
“This is America’s first strategic blueprint to increase and support the hiring of Veterans throughout the Federal workforce,” said OPM Director John Berry. “This plan aggressively dismantles barriers for Veterans seeking Federal employment. Additionally, it provides ongoing career support to Veterans working within the Federal workforce and specifically looks to support new veterans as they adjust to civilian work life.”
OPM convened senior leaders from the Departments of Defense, Labor, Veterans Affairs, Commerce, Homeland Security, Treasury, and Transportation to develop the plan.
+ Full Document (PDF; 1.3 MB)
Posted in Government and politics, Labor, Veterans | No Comments »
Saturday, January 30th, 2010
Netherlands: Davids Committee Report on Iraq (Rapport Commissie van Onderzoek Besluitvorming Irak)
Source: NRC International
The Balkenende government seems to have narrowly averted a full-blown crisis by admitting that “in hindsight” it could have done better in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. The admission did not come easily, following a day of tense deliberations between government parties.
The special committee of inquiry, chaired by retired supreme court judge, Willibrord Davids, did not mince words in its description of the political failures that paved the way to the invasion of Iraq. Its conclusions resonate with critical appraisals of the decision-making process leading up to the war in the UK and the US: politicians based their views on poor intelligence data and they deliberately misconstrued the little information they did get.
The legal case for an invasion was exaggerated, with precedents from international law misinterpreted through wishful thinking. After a limited number of executives decided to go through with the war, little room was left for debate. These failures had varying political consequences in different countries.
Not all Western countries fell victim to what might be labeled groupthink. France and Germany, notably, refused to support the American invasion of Iraq, which makes the question why the decision making process in other countries had such a different outcome all the more relevant.
+ Direct link to report – in Dutch, with English summary and conclusions pp 517 – 533 (PDF; 2.5 MB)
Posted in Documents in the news, Europe, Government and politics, International, Middle East, Military and defense | No Comments »
Saturday, January 30th, 2010
The Rutherford Institute Challenges Constitutionality of Stolen Valor Act, Files Amicus Brief in United States of America v. Strandlof
Source: The Rutherford Institute
The Rutherford Institute has filed an amicus brief in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in United States of America v. Strandlof. Since its founding in 1982, The Rutherford Institute has been a champion of the First Amendment right to free and unadulterated speech. To this end, the Institute’s amicus brief in United States of America v. Strandlof is a defense of the First Amendment, which is under massive attack in our politically correct society.
The Rutherford Institute does not in any way condone Mr. Strandlof’s actions as alleged in the charges against him. However, although we may disapprove of the purported content of Mr. Strandlof’s speech, we cannot support any laws–no matter how well intended–that serve to undermine the free speech rights of Americans. The federal law being used to prosecute Mr. Strandlof is such a law. Indeed, the Stolen Valor Act is so broad that it allows prosecution of someone who jokingly claims they received an honor or medal. In order to protect the right of freedom of expression, the law should show some clear harm resulting from a false statement. The Rutherford Institute could support such a law. Otherwise, the government has the authority to intimidate and even prosecute innocent expressions by veterans.
+ Full Document (PDF; 47 KB)
Posted in Government and politics, Legal and law enforcement, Veterans | No Comments »
Thursday, January 28th, 2010
Report Card: Government Failing to Protect America from Grave Threats of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism
Source: Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism
Former Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) and former Senator Jim Talent (R-MO), chair and vice chair of the bipartisan Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, today released a report card indicating that the U.S. government is not taking the necessary steps to protect the country from the threats posed by WMD and terrorism.
Of 17 grades, the report card includes three failing “F” grades on rapid and effective response to bioterrorism; Congressional oversight of homeland security and intelligence; and national security workforce recruitment. Fortunately, all three grades could be substantially improved by committed leadership in Congress and the Administration.
…
The Report Card also includes “A” grades for achieving specific actions related to a review of domestic programs to secure dangerous pathogens, for finalizing and approving an Interagency Bioforensics Strategy, and for conducting recommended reorganization inside the National Security Council.
+ World at Risk: The Report of the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism
Posted in Government and politics, National security, Terrorism | No Comments »
Wednesday, January 27th, 2010
Long-Term Implications of the Fiscal Year 2010 Defense Budget (PDF; 2.1 MB)
Source: Congressional Budget Office
FromCBO Director’s Blog:
What amount of budgetary resources might be needed in the long term to carry out the Administration’s plans for defense that were proposed during 2009? CBO addresses that question in a study prepared at the request of the Chairman and the Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee. The study updates the resource projections contained in CBO’s January 2009 paper Long-Term Implications of the 2009 Future Years Defense Program, reflecting changes that the new Administration made to defense plans in preparing the President’s budget request for fiscal year 2010.
In CBO’s estimation, carrying out the Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) 2009 plans for 2010 and beyond—excluding overseas contingency operations (the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and some much smaller military actions elsewhere)—would require defense resources averaging at least $573 billion annually (in 2010 dollars) from 2011 to 2028. That amount, CBO’s base projection, is about 7 percent more than the $534 billion in total obligational authority the Administration requested in its regular 2010 budget, again excluding overseas contingency operations. The projection also exceeds the peak of about $500 billion (in 2010 dollars) during the height of the Reagan Administration’s military buildup in the mid-1980s. During that period, for example, DoD was pursuing a Navy fleet of 600 battle force ships, more than twice the size of the current fleet of 287.
Posted in Business and economics, Government and politics, Military and defense | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 26th, 2010
Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy (PDF: 941 KB)
Source: Congressional Research Service (via Open CRS)
Upon taking office, the Obama Administration faced a deteriorating security environment in Afghanistan, despite a steady increase in U.S. forces there in recent years. Signs of deterioration have included an expanded area in which militants are operating, increasing numbers of civilian and military deaths, Afghan and international disillusionment with corruption in the government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and the ease of infiltration of Taliban militants from safe havens in Pakistan. Building on assessments completed in the latter days of the Bush Administration, the Obama Administration conducted a “strategic review,” the results of which were announced on March 27, 2009. The outcome of the review leaned toward those in the Administration who believe that adding combat troops is less crucial than building governance. As part of that review, the President did announce an increase of 21,000 U.S. troops, which arrived by November 2009 and brought U.S. force levels to about 68,000, in partnership with about 39,000 international forces from 42 other nations, and about 190,000 Afghan security forces.
The Administration also decided that more innovative military tactics were needed to promote those goals, and in May 2009, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David McKiernan, was replaced by Gen. Stanley McChrystal. On August 30, 2009, McChrystal submitted his review of the military strategy, recommending a fully resourced, comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy in order to avoid mission failure. He subsequently recommended that about 40,000 additional U.S. combat forces are needed to implement that strategy. A series of high level meetings to again review policy began September 30.
Posted in Afghanistan, Congressional Research Service, Government and politics, Military and defense | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 26th, 2010
Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses (PDF; 683 KB)
Source: Congressional Research Service (via Open CRS)
President Obama has said his Administration shares the goals of previous Administrations to contain Iran’s strategic capabilities and regional influence. The Administration has not changed the previous Administration’s characterization of Iran as a “profound threat to U.S. national security interests,” a perception generated not only by Iran’s nuclear program but also by its military assistance to armed groups in Iraq and Afghanistan, to the Palestinian group Hamas, and to Lebanese Hezbollah. The Obama Administration formulated approaches to achieve those goals that differ from those of its predecessor by expanding direct diplomatic engagement with Iran’s government and by downplaying discussion of potential U.S. military action against Iranian nuclear facilities. However, the domestic unrest in Iran that has burgeoned since alleged fraud in Iran’s June 12, 2009, presidential election has presented the Administration with a choice of whether to continue to engage Iran’s government or to back the growing ranks of the Iranian opposition.
Posted in Congressional Research Service, Government and politics, International Relations, Middle East, Terrorism | No Comments »
Monday, January 25th, 2010
The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC)–Responsibilities and Potential Congressional Concerns (PDF; 158 KB)
Source: Congressional Research Service (via OpenCRS)
The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) was established in 2004 to ensure that information from any source about potential terrorist acts against the U.S. could be made available to analysts and that appropriate responses could be planned. Investigations of the 9/11 attacks had demonstrated that information possessed by different agencies had not been shared and thus that disparate indications of the looming threat had not been connected and warning had not been provided. As a component of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the NCTC is composed of analysts with backgrounds in many government agencies and has access to various agency databases. It prepares studies ranging from strategic assessment of the future terrorist threats to daily briefings and situation reports. It is also responsible, directly to the President, for planning (but not directing) counterterrorism efforts.
Posted in Congressional Research Service, Government and politics, National security, Terrorism | No Comments »
Monday, January 25th, 2010
What Should You Know About Yemen
Source: The Brookings Institution
The media frenzy over who’s to blame for allowing a bomber to hop on a flight with explosives sewn into his underwear isn’t surprising. But it is distracting us from a much bigger question: What’s the deal with Yemen?
The Christmas bomber—like the Fort Hood shooter before him—had links to militants there. Why, after spending billions of dollars on our “war on terror,” is Al Qaeda still threatening the United States from safe havens in Yemen?
It’s not that we have ignored the country. Immediately after 9/11, the Bush Administration worked closely with Yemen on counterterrorism, yielding real results. Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Salih arrested scores of suspected terrorists, providing actionable intelligence to the United States.
We reciprocated by dispatching equipment and special operations units to support Yemeni forces. An unmanned CIA aircraft blew up a car in late 2002, killing suspected Al Qaeda operative and U.S.S. Cole attack mastermind Abu Ali al-Harithi. Terrorist activity subsided. Yemen was heralded by many in Washington as a success story in the global struggle against violent extremism. Check please.
Sadly, those gains were short-lived. The reemergence of Al Qaeda in Yemen, which began in 2006, makes it patently clear that a strategy based only on the killing of militants is neither effective nor sustainable. But what can we do differently?
See also: Al Qaeda in Yemen: A New Foothold
Posted in Africa, Government and politics, National security, Terrorism | No Comments »
Sunday, January 24th, 2010
Preparing and Training for the Full Spectrum of Military Challenges: Insights from the Experiences of China, France, the United Kingdom, India, and Israel
Source: RAND Corporation
The U.S. military training system is the envy of many countries around the world, so what can the United States learn from other militaries about how better to prepare for full-spectrum operations and deployments? The authors examine the militaries of China, France, the UK, India, and Israel to identify different approaches to readiness, adaptability, and operational issues, including
- using subject-matter experts to improve training for specific deployments
- using staff training to prepare forces for multiple contingencies
- allowing combat training centers to focus on foundational skills
- preparing units for a specific operational environment prior to deployment.
The authors also examine how the United States, France, and the UK prepare for and conduct train, advise, and assist (TAA) missions, finding that the three countries employ significantly different approaches to staff selection, TAA deployments, staff training, and career progression.
Posted in Asia, China, Europe, Middle East, Military and defense, United Kingdom | No Comments »
Friday, January 22nd, 2010
The Long-Term Outlook for the U.S. Navy’s Fleet (PDF; 138 KB)
Source: Congressional Budget Office
From CBO Director’s Blog:
Yesterday CBO senior analyst Eric Labs testified before the House Armed Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Seapower and Expeditionary Forces to discuss the challenges that the Navy is facing in its plans for building its future fleet. Specifically, the testimony focused on three matters: the Navy’s draft shipbuilding plan for fiscal year 2011; the effect that replacing Ohio class submarines (certain submarines that carry ballistic missiles) with a new class of submarines will have on the Navy’s shipbuilding program; and the number of ships that may be needed to support ballistic missile defense from the sea.
Posted in Business and economics, Government and politics, Military and defense | No Comments »
Wednesday, January 20th, 2010
New GAO Testimony (PDFs)
Source: Government Accountability Office
1. Defense Acquisitions: Managing Risk to Achieve Better Outcomes, by Paul Francis, managing director, and William Woods, director, acquisition and sourcing management; and Michael Golden, managing associate general counsel, before the Subcommittee on Defense, House Committee on Appropriations
Highlights ||| Full Report
Posted in Business and economics, GAO, Government and politics, Military and defense | No Comments »